A. The Plaintiff is an owner of 936 square meters and D 109 square meters in Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun.

B. The Defendant is a person who owns a wall in the part (B) part (a) of the ship, which connects each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 3, and 1 among the above land, to each point of (a) part (a) and the same appraisal map of 7 through 16, and 7, which connects each point of (c) part (a) of the building on the ground of 20 square meters and the same appraisal map to each point of 3, 4, 5, and 6 in sequence.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant, as the owner of the above land, is obligated to remove the fence of the (B) part of (A) part of the attached appraisal sheet attached to the Plaintiff, which connects each point of 1, 2, 3, and 1 to the Plaintiff, in sequence, each point of 7 through 16, and 7 of the same appraisal sheet, and the part of (A) which connects each point of 20 square meters of the same appraisal sheet to the Plaintiff, each point of 3, 4, 5, and 6.

3. The defendant's assertion that although the defendant intended to remove the above building, the plaintiff's removal vehicle, etc. prevents the entry of the removal vehicle, etc., the above building cannot be removed.

The evidence submitted by the defendant alone cannot admit the defendant's assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.