2. The reasoning of the court’s explanation on this part of the defense is that the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance is the same as that of the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

3. Judgment on the merits

(a) Occurrence and occurrence of liability for damages;

B. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the limitation of liability are the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part of the judgment is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(c) In addition to the separate statements below the scope of liability for damages, it shall be calculated on a monthly basis in accordance with the calculation method in which the interim interest is deducted at the rate of 5/12 per month (in accordance with the calculation method in which the interim interest is deducted at the rate of 5/12 per month, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis; however, it shall be excluded that the amount less than a month is included on the side which is less than the original and less than the last month), and that the parties’ claims are not separately explained

⑴ 일실수입 ㈎ 인적사항 : 별지 손해배상액 계산표 중 ‘기초사항’란 기재와 같다.

㈏ 소득 및 가동기간 : 보통인부의 도시일용노임, 가동일수는 월 22일, 60세가 될 때까지 ㈐ 입원기간 : 피고가 이 사건 사고일로부터 3일째가 되는 2011. 2. 24.부터 2012. 5. 9.까지 사이에 약 58일간 입원치료를 받았으므로, 편의상 이 사건 사고일로부터 연속하여 58일 동안(2011. 4. 19.까지)을 입원기간으로 보아 위 기간 동안 노동능력 100%를 상실한 것으로 인정한다

From July 19, 2013 during the period of hospitalization asserted by the Defendant.

7. Until December 22, 200, the hospitalization period is not included in the hospitalization period, since it is a hospitalization period due to the check operation that does not recognize causation with the accident of this case as follows.

). ㈑ 후유장해 신경외과 : 이 사건 사고일로부터 3년간 경추부 염좌로 노동능력 7%(맥브라이드...