beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.06.09 2015구단20957

추가상이처인정거부처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff entered the Army on August 22, 1967 and was discharged from military service on May 31, 1975. The plaintiff participated in Vietnam from February 20, 1969 to April 4, 1970 when he was discharged from military service.

B. The plaintiff asserts that he suffered injury in Vietnam War, and as follows, the defendant suffered injury on September 13, 2001 due to the reasons for the disposition of the defendant's application for the registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the right-hand side of March 16, 2009 that there was no specific and objective evidence corresponding to non-applicable in the original right-hand side of Sep. 13, 2001, the statement of B that recognized the right-hand side of Oct. 30, 1969 to the right-hand side of November 9 of the same year, the medical advice showed that he was treated from Oct. 30, 196, and that the result of the medical consultation shows that he would be caused by the right-hand side of Feb. 10, 2010, the two sides were never asserted as the first application for registration, and there was no objective evidence that there was no objective evidence.

C. The Plaintiff was recognized as a whole on the right-hand high-speed window through the resolution of March 16, 2009, but was judged as a result of the physical examination of the disability rating on the ground that the physical examination was conducted on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have functional disorder in the right-hand high-speed physical examination and radiation examination in light of the circumstances.

On November 17, 2014, the Defendant claimed that he/she suffered from the injury on the left-hand head, ② the left-hand snow, ③ the left-hand top-hand side, and ③ The Defendant filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State. However, on July 8, 2015, the Defendant did not notify him/her of the fact that the injury on the left-hand head, the left-hand eye, and the left-hand side was a original injury on the verification document, and the record on the military records was not verified, and the record on the military records was not confirmed, and the Defendant notified him/her of the determination that he/she was not responsible for the State of distinguished service to the State (the instant disposition was conducted in the following following) that he/she recognized the injury as a combat-related factor only on the “S

[Ground of recognition] dispute.