If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 00:40 on February 8, 2013, the Defendant requested that D, who driven a cab for business purpose in front of the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B District, visit the District District, and would not cause customers boarding the cab to sleep and locked. As such, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim of the cab by stating that D, who was the victim E, who was the victim of the said District, was a victim of the said District, and reported by D, etc., on the ground that D, who was the above cab driver, was able to cover the Defendant, pay the taxi expenses, and return home, and that D, etc., she was the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;