beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.05.24 2017고단4288

사기등

Text

The defendant shall be punished by penal detention for ten days, by imprisonment for six months, and by penal detention for the remainder of the defendant, respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant of "2017 Highest 4288" was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for six months by obstructing business operations at the Ulsan District Court on December 22, 2016, and is currently under suspension of execution after the judgment becomes final and conclusive on December 30, 2016.

1. On July 13, 2017, the Defendant was boarding a D private taxi operated by the victim C on the front side of the company bank located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, Incheon-ro, 332-1 on July 13, 2017, and the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay all of the taxi charges because only KRW 10,000 is under water; and (b) the Defendant had the victim paid all of the taxi charges despite there is no intention or ability to pay all of the taxi charges, and the Defendant did not cause the victim to go to the cream, "Haak-do, Haak-do, Haak-do, Haak-do, Haak-do," "Haak-do, Haak-do, Haak-dong, and Haak-dong, "Haak-dong, Haak-dong, Haak-dong, Haak-dong, Pul-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do."

“The taxi fee of KRW 61,800 was not paid, thereby acquiring economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.”

2. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at a convenience store located in the military street in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) reported 112 on September 12, 2017, the Defendant: (c) discovered the Ulsan-gu police station in Ulsan-gu; (d) on the same day on which the police officer sent to the scene returned a person who was killed in the name of the deceased; (c) but (d) on the same day on the same day as the person was diving, the Defendant found the Ulsan-gu Police Agency in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

Although the Defendant arrived at the Ulsan District Police Agency, the Defendant was forced to break the iron door, and forced to break the iron door.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.