When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who has operated a danran with the trade name “D” on the Seongdong-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si C.

Around April 30, 2008, the Defendant at the Defendant’s home located in Sungnam-si A, Sungnam-si, 2008, stated that “The Victim F will run a dan business in partnership with the other partner, and have the other partner retire to settle the accounts. The Defendant would have paid monthly interest of KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for each month, and paid the principal at any time when needed.

However, the defendant did not have any special property, and the above danran business did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed money in accordance with the above agreement even though he/she borrowed money from the victim because there is no income.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by deceiving the complainant, was issued 10 million won in the name of the head of the Tong in the name of A at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the witness F’s statutory statement Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;