However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On May 20, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case in violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) against No. 6429, No. 2015, No. 6429, May 20, 2016 (hereinafter “case subject to perjury”) at the court of Suwon District Court No. 110, and gave a good faith under the law.

① The Defendant had been informed to D of the fact that the Defendant was absolutely unable to carry on the illegal business in the above building.

We answer to the question of "Ack", and answer to the question of "Ack that a witness had friended D to the point that he would not absolutely commit any unlawful act, such as arranging sexual traffic," and answer to the question of "Ack that the witness would have clearly notified D that he would not commit any unlawful act," and the counsel's "Ack" did not know D even after concluding a lease agreement on April 14, 2015, and on April 28, 2015, the defendant was under contact with the above police station on the part of the Republic of Korea as the brokerage day for sexual traffic in the above building, and became the first call of D through E's real estate of the Eth witness to know that he would not have committed any unlawful act.

I reply to the question “I” and “I do not answer to the question “I do not have any contact with D before it?”

The prosecutor respondeds as follows: “Before the Defendant was put into control, the Defendant and the state boomed, and fluent fluents were divided into fluencies.”

2.3 20 Doesctrine

“I do not know” to the question “?”

“To answer” and to the question of “I am asked how the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was under control,” and to the question of “I am only after the new lessee was cracked as D”.

The answer to “the memory of telephone conversations” is the answer.