재요양 및 추가상병 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Details of the disposition
On June 4, 2007, the Plaintiff suffered from occupational accidents that are faced with heavy weight on his head’s side (hereinafter “the instant disaster”) while performing construction work, and received medical treatment by November 30, 2007, after obtaining approval from the Defendant for the medical care of the “salinum base and the U.S. U.S. M. M. S. M. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. T
After that, the "protruding (escapping)" was approved as an additional injury and disease, and was treated until December 3, 201.
(2) On September 2, 201, the Plaintiff filed an additional medical care application with respect to the Defendant on September 2, 2013, and the Defendant filed an additional medical care application with respect to the “protruding signboards (e.g., protruding out (e., escape) during the period no. 6-7)” (hereinafter “protruding out (hereinafter referred to as “protruding signboards”) with respect to which the Plaintiff received medical treatment by December 3, 2011. However, on September 23, 2014, the Defendant filed an additional medical care application with respect to the instant protruding signboards accompanied by the No. 447 (hereinafter referred to as “the instant disposition”). In so doing, the Defendant rendered a non-approval of all these measures (hereinafter referred to as “the instant disposition”).
[Grounds for recognition] A. 2, Eul evidence No. 1, and Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the entire argument as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, the plaintiff asserted that the disposition of this case was legitimate, did not have a daily life due to serious pains even after the completion of treatment for the previous approved sick and wounded. According to the medical opinion of the hospital that received the medical treatment, the injury and disease in the application for additional medical care constitutes the requirements for additional medical care, and the injury and disease in the application for additional medical care constitutes the requirements for additional medical care, and thus, the disposition of this case, which
On June 2007, the Plaintiff of the Republic of Korea (In U.S. Busan Mack Hospital) administered both 3,4,5,6,7 times for the following reasons: (a) The Plaintiff of the Republic of Korea (In U.S. Busan Mack University) medical opinion, under the diagnosis by the Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Mac-Ma