except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 1, 2013, the Defendant, as a person eligible for call-up to public duty personnel service, received a notice of call-up to public duty personnel service personnel service in the name of the director of the regional military manpower office in the name of Chungcheongnam-gun, the mother of the Defendant, who was on October 1, 2013, and was on October 14, 2013 from the Defendant’s house located in the Danam Budget Group C2, and subsequently delivered the said notice to the Defendant, but did not comply with call-up without justifiable grounds until October 17, 2013, which was three days after

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement and B of the accuser;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing convening public duty personnel;

1. The main sentence of Article 88 (1) of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Persons with the most fundamental obligation of all citizens, which does not correspond to the crime committed without any justifiable reason, but reflects the unity of all the crimes, and there is no history of punishment exceeding the same kind of criminal record or