If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

On April 17, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on April 17, 2017, and turned the front road of the Sung-gu Sung-dong Sung-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, into the east-dong-do west-do west-do west-do west-do, 20 kilometers a speed of about 10 kilometers.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected his duty of care and proceeded as it was due to the negligence of the Defendant, the victim D (the age of 57) who was going to go to a pharmacist's Myeon from the wall mountain apartment room in the sloping-dong, Sung-dong, Sung-dong, was found to have been on the part of loading the above Poter's cargo to the left surface of the Epthnbbbbbbfr.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “finites and tensions of the bones of wood,” which requires medical treatment for about two weeks due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the finite finite finite frings to ensure that the sum of repair costs, such as the finite finite finite correction of the finite frings, and escaped without immediately

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, and G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Vehicle photographs (the sequence 4,5 of evidence list);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of view of failing to take measures after the accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.