2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

A. On December 2, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff for the advertisement and publicity of online shopping mall operated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant publicity consignment contract”).

(2) The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff-based limited liability company seeking the payment of commission fees under the instant publicity consignment agreement with the Gwangju District Court 2017Gahap56068, but this court rendered a judgment dismissing all the Defendant’s claims on November 2, 2017, and the Defendant appealed as the Gwangju High Court 2017Na15255, but the appeal was dismissed.

3) The Defendant alleged as follows: “The Plaintiff is obligated to pay the Defendant an unpaid amount of KRW 60 million, as the Plaintiff failed to perform its obligations under the instant consignment contract; the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff under the Gwangju District Court 2017Kadan969; however, this Court rendered a ruling dismissing the Defendant’s claim on November 24, 2017. The Defendant appealed as the Gwangju District Court 2017Na64162, but the appeal was dismissed. (b) The Defendant filed an application for provisional attachment of real estate owned by the Plaintiff for provisional attachment of Gwangju District Court 2017Kadan247, 2017Kahap5074, 1) out of 3/5 shares (hereinafter “the instant land”). out of 1498 square meters in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju District Court 2017Kadan2477, 2000, the Defendant revoked the provisional attachment of real estate as the provisional attachment of KRW 20172,201.

2 In addition, for the enforcement preservation of claims in the case No. 2017Gahap56068 of Gwangju District Court, the Defendant filed an application for provisional seizure of real estate with respect to the instant land owned by the Plaintiff with the Gwangju District Court No. 2017Kahap50174, the amount claimed as KRW 297,94,649.