If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

around 20:00 on April 12, 2016, the Defendant purchased 70,000 won from C with knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen product of KRW 900,000 in the gallon 4 smartphone market in the new subway station in Gangnam-gu Seoul on the 10th day of the same month, and acquired D from D around May 27, 2016, with knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen product of KRW 90,000,000,000 from the victim EG G5 smartphone market price of KRW 90,000,000,000 from the new subway station in Seoul, and acquired D from D on the 1st day of the 24th day of the same month, with knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen product of KRW 120,000,000,000 from the new subway station in Seoul on the 10th day of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against C, D, or F;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Kakao Stockholm: Application of statutes on information and dialogue between H subscribers;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (opportune selection);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;