When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Part of the facts charged shall be revised and supplemented without going through amendments to Bill of Indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense right.

At around 12:00 on August 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) laid the stairs of the Defendant in the “E” located in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and (b) was inflicted an injury upon the Victim G (34 years of age) for 14 days, such as the victim G, etc., who was frighted to the right string and pushed the F’s arms on the ground that the victim G (34 years of age) slided the sound, and walked the victim G, etc. one time, and walked the victim G, etc., one time, and met the victim G with the face of the drinking and the breast.

In addition, while the defendant assaulted G, the victim F(32 years of age) committed an injury that requires treatment for 14 days to the victim F, such as the right hand hand over, the right knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, and the knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Statement of the police officer in G (including the F’s statement part);

1. Damage photographs;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument and the defense counsel asserts that the behavior of the defendant does not constitute a crime of self-defense or legitimate act by defending himself against serious insulting acts such as noise from the opening of the victim G and the victim's intentional action.

2. We examine the judgment, the evidence, in particular, the victim G and F’s specific and consistent statement, and the video and voice of video CDs recorded at the time, the victim G.