If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On January 2012, the Defendant conspired with B to forge the C’s water purifier siren contract in collusion with B upon receipt of a request from B to prepare and request a erogian water purifier siren contract while driving in C from January 2012.

On the 5th day of the same month, the Defendant entered the name “C” and signed C in the signature column, respectively, in the “written consent on the use of personal information and the provision of personal financial transaction information” of the siren(s) agreement provided by the water purifier installer who visited in response to B’s request for a siren(s) and B’s request for a siren(s) and the “written consent on the use of personal information and the provision of personal financial transaction information.”

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, forged a rental contract in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), delivered a rental contract under the name of C, which was forged, to B, and caused B to provide the name-free erosweet installer who was unaware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, exercised a rental contract in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations that are forged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 231 and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234, 231 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;