When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 28, 2014, the date of the case to specify the property of Changwon District Court No. 2014Kao1681, the Defendant presented a list of property list to the effect that, around 16:00 on July 28, 2014, the Changwon District Court No. 219, which was located in Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and that, at the time of Changwon-si, the Defendant was present as the debtor and only two parcels of land in Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and that there was no property disposed of within two years prior to

However, in fact, the Defendant: (a) on January 3, 2013, 12,00 shares of (mainly from D) Solrawls Fertilizer; and (b) the same month.

15. (States) Any holding of 12,500 shares of an international roller environment, respectively, and the same year;

2.5. E apartment 112, 301, 302, and 303 have been completed for each registration of ownership transfer on the ground of donation to F, who is the husband.

Accordingly, the Defendant submitted a false list of property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer in G (number 8);

1. An investigation report (Attachment to a stock transfer contract, etc.), an investigation report, and an investigation report (a report accompanied by a certified copy of the real estate register);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a summons for the name of property, date of time, and full certificate of registered matters;

1. Article 68 (9) of the Civil Execution Act (Selection of Fine) concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The act of submitting a false inventory of property against an order to specify the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is difficult for creditors to remedy their rights due to the State’s forced power, and therefore, the liability for the crime cannot be deemed to be light.

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized, and the defendant has no specific criminal power except for punishment once by a fine in 2014, and the defendant's omitted property was a property prior to the creditor G, the size of the property omitted by the defendant, the sentencing in similar cases, etc. shall be considered.