2. On May 27, 2017, there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the crimes and reflects, and that the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving self-driving on May 27, 2017 was not high by 0.059%.

However, in full view of the various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, the Defendant did not recognize that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable, even though he/she was not aware of the fact that he/she had been indicted on April 27, 2017 due to driving under the influence of alcohol and without a license for driving under the influence of alcohol, and was tried on April 4, 2017.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.