2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. Around 2010, the net B and F’s building delivery litigation network B (hereinafter “the network”) filed a lawsuit against F, the Plaintiff’s representative, such as the transfer of land (hereinafter “instant building”) seeking delivery of the instant building (hereinafter “the instant lawsuit”). Around October 26, 2010, the court sentenced F to the judgment accepting the deceased’s claim on the ground of this Court, 2010Gadan805, which declared that F, a cement brick, a slve roof, a house of 74.25 square meters, and cement brick, a cement brick, a slves roof, and a single-story, an appurtenant building, and 6.27 square meters, and 74.45 square meters in total, of the above buildings (hereinafter “the instant building”). The appeal and appeal were final and conclusive on April 201.

B. Around May 2014, the deceased filed an application for compulsory execution on the instant building with the former judgment finalized in this court as the executive title. On October 7, 2014, H conducted the delivery execution on the instant building under this court’s title as the enforcement title. Around October 2014, H kept corporeal movables in the attached list (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movables”) located in the instant building to the deceased while executing the delivery execution on the instant building. Accordingly, the deceased kept the instant corporeal movables in the attached list (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movables”).

C. Around November 2014, the deceased applied for a provisional order for the realization of the instant corporeal movables to this court. Around November 2014, 2014, the deceased applied for a provisional order for the realization of the said corporeal movables, and the enforcement officer of this court delegated by the deceased applied for the permission for the sale of movables and received a decision to permit the sale of movables to this court L. 2) The deceased, based on the said decision to permit the sale of movables, was issued as the court 2014No6495.