2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected against the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

However, even though the defendant had been punished six times as a result of the violation of the Road Traffic Act, such as drinking and driving without a license, and even though there are many times of punishment, the defendant is driving under the influence of alcohol at 0.361% of alcohol without a driver's license, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, which include the same kind of crime without being aware of even though he was a repeated crime due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). In full view of all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances of each of the crimes of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is deemed proper and it cannot be deemed unfair since the defendant's above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.