2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized as favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant was driving after about six hours after drinking the last alcoholic beverage, and that the distance of driving is short.

However, driving under drinking is required to be strictly punished for crimes that may cause serious harm to the life and body of others as well as himself, and the defendant has already been punished for driving under drinking in 208 and 2013, and again, driving under drinking in this case even though he had the record of being punished for driving under drinking in 2008 and 2013, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the court below sentenced the lowest statutory penalty by reducing the fine for a summary order in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and theories of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, and the background of the crime in this case, it cannot be deemed unfair

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.