The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the victim’s specific and insulting meaning in the offense of insult, and acts that do not contravene social norms.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.