A. In the case of perjury that is the Defendant, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact that the lower court recognized the fact as a perjury despite the fact that the Defendant testified that “the Defendant gave a copy of a promissory note to D at the home of D” was the testimony consistent with the witness memory and did not constitute perjury.

B. The sentence of the lower court on the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of community service, 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of fact