폭행
Defendant
In respect of B, a sentence of punishment shall be suspended.
Defendant
A The prosecution against A is dismissed.
Punishment of the crime
On July 23, 2013, the victim A (n, 42 years of age) was found in the above J apartment in order to talk about the issue of support by the mother of the E, F and G, and about the monetary issues due to the termination of the lease contract at the 302 J apartment 302 Dong 601, Defendant I, the residence of the Defendant I.
Defendant
B around 18:30 on July 23, 2013, the day following the day on which the victim gets away from his arms to enter the apartment in J Apartment 302 601 on July 23, 2013.
7. Around 19:00, at the same place, the victim sent a petition for bankruptcy at the same time, and the victim took care of the right hand hand hand hand of the victim, and the victim was on both hand, which requires two weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant B’s legal statement (as of the third trial date);
1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;
1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);
1. The part dismissing the prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the penance, the fact that there is no past record of criminal punishment, and the fact that both the defendant B and the victim A do not want to be punished for each other in the smooth resolution of the instant case caused by a dispute between the places where the victims and the defendant B do not wish
1. On July 24, 2013, Defendant A assaulted the victim’s timber and arms with the victim’s hand during the process of having a conflict with the victim’s J apartment Nos. 302, 601, J apartment Nos. 302, 38, and 601, Defendant A of the facts charged.
2. We examine the judgment. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to a written agreement bound in the trial records, B of this case is prosecuted.