However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On June 9, 2016, the defrauded made a false statement to the effect that, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim D as a person with bad credit standing, the Defendant presented the Defendant’s multi-stage allowance details to the effect that “The Defendant is urgently required to pay taxes by making a large amount of money in the year. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million, the Defendant would have to pay KRW 40 million after three months thereafter.”

Around June 10, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 30 million won from the victim to the F Bank account (G) account in the name of the Defendant E in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by defrauded.

2. The false statement to the effect that “A money may be extended at a low interest rate if an existing loan is repaid,” by falsely misrepresenting a large number of unspecified persons to the effect that he/she is an employee in charge of lending a financial institution, and instead, he/she wired money to the account under the name of the defendant, and the defendant was aware that the act of withdrawing money remitted to his/her account and delivering it to another officer may have been involved in an unlawful act, such as scaming, etc., even though he/she knew that the act of withdrawing money wired to his/her account could have been delayed, he/she provided the defendant’s account to an unspecified person in accordance with the order of the person in charge of false statement and provided the defendant’s account to be used as the receipt account of the fraud, and he/she was willing to withdraw money

On February 14, 2019, the name-in-factist may obtain government subsidies from the victim at a low interest rate if he/she has paid 40 million won in advance, which is 50% per annum 90,000 won at present-use Eths passbook 90,000 won by phone call to the victim H at an unsound place, and then he/she assumes a false representation in the name of the defendant at around 12:54 on the same day.