If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is the E, the representative of the D Company, the contractor of Busan Seo-gu C Apartment.

On November 6, 2012, the execution of the delivery of real estate was completed on November 6, 2012 by the order of delivery of real estate against the Defendant of FF corporation G in Busan District Court, G, which was residing in the above C apartment 6

Nevertheless, in collusion with the above E on November 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance correction device using the Raber on the front of this C Apartment 604; and (b) went into the house and intruded into the real estate ordered by compulsory execution.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation (including attached data, such as a register of real estate register and a written execution of delivery of real estate);

1. Article 140-2 and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;