In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

The Defendants filed a number of civil lawsuits, etc. against their mother, her pro-friendly E (Defendant A’s husband), F (Defendant B’s husband), and friendly G under the victim D’s hand.

1. On October 29, 2017, at the H parking lot in Busan, Dongdong-gu, Busan, Defendant A, Defendant A, who was reported and sent to the 112 report, openly insulting the victim by referring to the following: “The victim is not a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, and a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, a son, and a son.”

2. The Defendant B, at the time and place set out in paragraph 1, and at the place where the police officer I, J, and his name infarction, who was dispatched upon report 112, had the victim “I, J, and I, who was so farced, and was so farced, a false-end suit was

7 Is human beings in a case or litigation;

Along with the Dogate, bad years, the court of law, and the Dogate, dyna, dynas, dynas, dynas, dynas, dynas, and dynas.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each of the statutory statements made by witnesses D and J

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Attraction of a workhouse, Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;