게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable for the lower court’s sentence [2 years of suspended sentence for one year of imprisonment for Defendant B; 120 hours of community service for Defendant C; 2 years of suspended sentence for one year of imprisonment for Defendant C; 120 hours of community service for 120 hours of suspended sentence; and 2 years of suspended sentence for Defendant C].
2. In full view of the circumstances revealed by the lower court in the grounds for sentencing and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants is deemed appropriate, and is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, and there are no other special circumstances to change the above punishment. Therefore, the Defendants’ wrongful assertion of sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is obvious that the “compacted” of the facts constituting the crime No. 2 of the lower judgment is a clerical error of the “acquisition”, and thus, it is corrected ex officio under Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure