(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The Plaintiff asserted that Defendant C had a duty to pay the claim amount as stated in the claim amount as compensation or return of unjust enrichment for non-performance of material supply contract jointly and severally with Defendant B, since Defendant C was engaged in a steel product sales business as stated in the attached form of claim with Defendant B.

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that Defendant C had engaged in steel materials sales business as Defendant B and partnership business, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Therefore, we cannot accept the Plaintiff’s assertion on the premise that Defendant C was in partnership with Defendant C.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified, and the claim against the defendant C is dismissed as it is without merit.