2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it, and that the defendant is the first offender. However, in addition to the unfavorable condition against the defendant such as the fact that the period of the crime of this case is not shorter than the period of the crime of this case, there is no change of circumstances that the court below sentenced the lowest punishment within the range of the punishment that has been mitigated only once, and considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime of this case, etc., the court below's punishment is judged to be appropriate, and it is not recognized that the defendant's argument is unreasonable because it is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, under Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the application of the reasoning of the judgment below

1. Change of the discretionary mitigation column to “Article 55(1)3” to “Article 55(1)3 and 6” and change to “Article 55(1)3 and 6.”

.