When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 23, 2017, at around 03:50, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 that he was used in Suwon-si B and B, Suwon-si “C” on April 23, 2017; (b) the Defendant: (c) asked whether the police officer, who belongs to the police commander of the Suwon-gu Police Station D, called the Defendant, would be able to cover and pay the drinking value; and (d) then, (c) the Defendant sold the clothes of E by drinking, two times, and one chest.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act: The defendant's assault against a police officer in the course of being committed to interfere with the performance of official duties, and circumstances favorable to the nature of the crime is not good: The defendant's mistake is recognized and seriously reflected: there is no past record of criminal punishment; the degree of assault is likely to be excessive; and all kinds of sentencing conditions such as the above circumstances, the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, etc. shall be determined as ordered by the order.