If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 19, 2013, the Defendant driven a CM5 car on May 19, 2013, and led to the two-lane road in front of the Eriju station located in D at Incheon City.

The Defendant’s negligence over the center line, which led from the fault of driving the center line to the territorial sea, received the front part of the passenger vehicle of the victim F.F.(57 years old) G-Whn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-W

The Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, suffered injury, such as the closure duplic duplic fy, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment to the victim, and at the same time, destroyed the said duplic duplic duplic fy to the repair cost of KRW 2,019,786, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as stopping, and providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F (Simplified traffic);

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Investigation report (specific suspect);

1. Investigation report (as to whether or not moving) and guidance around the place of accident;

1. Each written diagnosis (F), written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident site photographs;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after causing damage and destruction);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which causes a traffic accident, and the defendant runs away without immediately stopping. Such an act is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant that the necessity of punishment is high, and the defendant has agreed smoothly with the victim of the traffic accident, and the fact that the defendant led to confession of the crime of this case and is against the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

The records of this case, including the above circumstances.