However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a CM3 car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.174% at a section of about 4km from the front of a nuclear hospital located in the Gongju-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu to the front of the 681 Taenk-ro, Taek-ro, Taek-ro, Seoul, to the road.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. The Defendant, at around 23:50 on the same day, was under the traffic guard of Seoul Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, 681, and was under the influence of drinking on the front of the rolling stock village, and the traffic patrol from the police station E and the slopeF belonging to D, and the horses that “the police officer goes home to the workplace” from the above E, “the police officer does not go to the house;

A police officer often speaks on a foodme by dopinging down alcohol control, and he/she tried to see the governance or governance of "if he/she was removed from the above F, he/she was fluor, so he/she was fluored by fluor, fluor, fluor, and fluor by fluor, while fluoring fluor "a fluoring fluor," and fluor by fluor.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officers on the crackdown on drinking alcohol.

B. At around 23:50 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties at the same place as the above Paragraph A, and around 00:12 on April 6, 2016, the Defendant was connected to the D Office of Seoul Nowon-gu Nowon-gu Police Station located in 283, Nowon-gu, Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, and then arrested the Defendant.

“In accordance with the foregoing paragraph, assaulted on the hand floor of the F at one time by taking the above F’s cream into account.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties in the criminal investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the circumstances of drivers of drinking alcohol and inquire about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking) of the same Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment for each sentence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;