약정금
1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended and reduced in this court, shall be modified as follows.
1. The reasoning for this court’s explanation is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) On the second and second sides of the judgment of the first instance, the term “from the beginning of 2016” to “from the beginning of 2006.” (2) On the fourth and fourth sides of the judgment of the first instance, the term “the instant joint council agreement” to be “the instant joint council resolution” to be amended to “the instant joint council resolution.”
3) The 6th sentence of the judgment of the first instance is the person immediately after the sentence was pronounced, and the 10th through November, 2018 under which the 10th sentence “from the same side” is changed to “from the 10th sentence to the 11th sentence,” and the 9th sentence is changed to “the name of school expense assistance, relief assistance, and scholarship items” under the 9th sentence below. 4) The 8th sentence below is changed to “the same as the 8th sentence” under the 6th sentence of the judgment of the first instance.
B. The following shall be added to the part to be added under the 6th judgment of the first instance.
3) From December 2018 to December 2019, the Defendant church paid KRW 100,000,000,000 as the items of the case expenses for the pastors, and one million won in total, as the items of the school subsidies or the relief expenses, and scholarships.
A person shall be appointed.
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant church sought payment of the agreed amount to the defendant church according to the resolution of the joint council of this case that occurred after the judgment of the appellate court of this case. However, unlike the above appellate court's judgment, the case of KRW 2,520,000,00 (=14,910,000 won (=25.28,660,000 won) KRW 1,535,535,00 won (1,535,000 won) x 1,5350,000 won) x 1,520,000 won x 1,5350,000 won x 1,5450,000 won as indicated below on the following list on the premise that the amount including all of the monthly case expenses paid by the defendant church to the succeeding pastors is the case cost of the succeeding pastors: 1.7 million won x 1.7 million won x x 1.0 months x 1.