A. Defendant A (Definite) was a group from the victim and his behaviors, and there was no assault against the victim.

B. Defendant B (1) There is no fact that the Defendant committed an assault against the victim.

(2) The sentence imposed by the lower court of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) The court below found the Defendants guilty of the facts charged by taking full account of the evidence as stated in the judgment of the court below.

(2) In light of the following circumstances, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable, taking into account the circumstances cited by the lower court and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court.

Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

① The Defendants are in line with the village development.

Around the time of this case, the residents of the village who were living together were divided into opinions about the development issue of the mountain, which is located in the back of the village, but Defendant A opposed to the development of the mountain, and Defendant B consented thereto.

However, on the day of the instant case, the Defendants dice alcohol at the same conference from the A.M., and at the same time, 3-lanes of the instant singing.

At this point, Defendant A told Defendant B that “I wish to agree to the development of ice,” and Defendant B asked Defendant A to “I see whether I am? I am? I am? I am? I am am? I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.

(2) The Defendants stated from the police to the other party in the original trial that they were in contact with each other.

(Evidence Records 6, 42, 211, 215, 112 of the trial records, 131 of the trial records, and 131 of the trial records). K witnessing the site at the time of the instant case, at the police and the court of original instance, heard the voice of fighting, and read the Defendants. Defendant A was the following, and himself was the Defendant.