[criminal power] On April 8, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on April 8, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for the same crime in the same court on July 14, 2011, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months for the same court on June 8, 2012, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 1 year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on July 17, 2014, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for the same court on July 17, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On January 4, 2015, at around 20:20, the Defendant driven BNEW EF Laol car with approximately KRW 100 meters alcohol concentration 0.11% under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license for the front road, regardless of the same sex or the front road in front of the Seosan-si, Seosan-si.

Accordingly, the defendant, while driving without a license, was in violation of the prohibition on drinking at least twice, driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of re-driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of enforcement, reports on the results of the control of drinking driving, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, repeated statements, each summary order, application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act include the criminal records having been punished several times, including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and the same crime has been committed again while the defendant was tried for the same kind of crime, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of the instant case shall be determined by taking into account all the sentencing conditions as the order