토지소유권이전
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of Article 3(b) of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The part to be mard;
B. The validity of the ownership transfer registration of this case is 1) since the transfer registration made under the name of the former owner after the death of the former owner is deemed to be invalid, and thus, it cannot be recognized that the assertion of validity of the registration is consistent with the present substantive relationship (Supreme Court Decision 83Meu597, Aug. 23, 1983). The transfer registration of this case was completed on March 17, 1993 on the land of this case, which was owned D, but D had already died on January 15, 1984, which was 194. Thus, it cannot be recognized that the registration of ownership transfer of this case was completed on the land of this case under the name of the former owner of this case, 1.5 square meters prior to the sale of this case, 2.000 square meters prior to the death of the former owner of this case, 3.00 square meters prior to the transfer of ownership registration of this case, 4.5 square meters of forest and field, and 5.04 square meters of this case’s forest and field, 18.