beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.11.21 2013고합124

살인

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for twelve years.

One (No. 1) seized from the accused shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant did not have a certain occupation, and due to the Nonparty’s perception from ordinary family members, the Defendant was in the way of making the victim C(54 years of age, women) who is one’s wife without any special reason.

At around 00:10 on May 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) talked with the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, 107 dong 403, and talked with the Defendant who had a prudented that the Defendant would not make a proper call; (b) she saw the victim as a marb by mixing with the original network, and (c) she considered the victim as being deprived of the victim, and she killed the victim’s stroke because of the loss (proof No. 1) in the house, the head level of the victim was 4 times, and the type was strokeed by strokeing the victim’s stroke.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. 112 Reporting case management table;

1. Investigation report (on the spot inspection of a permanent official and a corpse), field photographs, etc.;

1. Ratifications;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes No. 1 (hereinafter “criminal fact”)

1. Article 250 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture: homicide 2 types: homicide 2. Ordinary motive (special person) - mitigated element: Self-denunciation (decision on the recommended sphere): Imprisonment with prison labor for up to 7 years and imprisonment for up to 12 years (decision on the sentenced area): Defendant voluntarily surrendered to the police upon the death of the victim.

These circumstances are favorable to the defendant.

According to the results and records of the trial of this case, the defendant left without any special occupation, while the victim has operated cleaning service providers and has been responsible for his family's livelihood for more than 10 years.

The defendant has assaulted the victim from the above position without any special reason, and recently, the victim seems to have been proven by the time limit of her wife, and the victim was abused.