However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On July 30, 2015, the Defendant was a person who is engaged in driving a car at C, and operated the said car at around 10:30 on July 30, 2015, and led to the flow of about 50km at the speed from the west IC to the Myeon Office at the speed of about 50km.

Since there is a bend, the center line of the yellow-ray is installed, in such a case, there was a duty of care for the person engaged in driving duty to thoroughly see the front line and safely drive the car.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the negligence of driving the center line, and received the front part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the victim D(W, 68 years old) who was driving on the opposite two-lane.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the foregoing occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, such as a bend in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the body part of the water table, which requires approximately 6 weeks of treatment to the victim F (V, 52 years of age) who was the passenger of the Defendant’s vehicle, suffered injury to the victim F, who was the passenger of the vehicle, for approximately 2 weeks of treatment, such as dynasium and tensions that require approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the passenger of the vehicle, and the injury to the Defendant’s passenger H (V, 51 years of age) who was in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the passenger of the vehicle, such injury as a bend in the bend part of the bridge part of the vehicle, and the injury such as a bend in the body of the body of the Defendant’s passenger I (V, 56 years of age) who was in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment without prison labor (including that many victims have occurred, that the degree of injury is heavy, and that the central line is an accident).