2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. From March 22, 2012, the Plaintiff worked as a street cleaners who is a life contract worker at the management office affiliated with the Defendant from around 2006, and was on March 22, 2012, at around 1,550, the Plaintiff attended a meeting to oppose the construction of the thermal power plant in front of the Maritime Affairs Office in the front of the Maritime Affairs Office in the area of the Gun in which approximately 1,550 members were present at the Gun, Gun, Namnam-gu, Gun, Namnam-do, and the Plaintiff was dismissed on March 16, 2013 by taking off the electronic reduction machine attached to the front door of the entrance entrance at the Maritime Affairs Office in the front of the Maritime Affairs Office in order to occupy the military room while participating in the opposing activities for the construction of the thermal power plant (hereinafter referred to as the “instant criminal act”). The Plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed on March 21, 2013 by being sentenced to a suspended sentence of 30 years (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant’s appeal).213131).

B. Upon the final judgment of the above criminal case against the Plaintiff, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the dismissal (cancellation) on November 22, 2013 on the ground that it falls under the provisions of Articles 9 and 26 of the Regulations on Contracts for Life in Antarctica and the Management of Fixed-Term Workers (hereinafter “Management Regulations”).

(hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”). C.

The management regulations shall include the parts related to the instant case as shown in the attached Form.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties concerned is not a public official who requires high level trust and integrity, but a civilian status who entered into a life insurance contract with the defendant who is a local government. The criminal act of this case does not affect the defendant's trust in or image of the environmental beauty work due to the lack of relations with the environmental beauty work of the plaintiff.