If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

[2014 High 1647] The Defendant, who is difficult to purchase a mobile phone in his or her name as a bad credit holder, was able to use the mobile phone in the name of E by stealing the Defendant’s type E personal information.

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On May 23, 2013, the Defendant entered “E”, “F”, “H”, “E”, and “E” in the resident registration number column in the applicant column in the name of the applicant for the re-issuance of the resident registration certificate at the Seogu-gu and Seodong Residents’ Center 22-gilo-ro, 22-gilo, Seogu, Daegu-gu, and the Mari-dong Residents’ Center, and presented as if he/she was duly formed with the said resident service center staff I who was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for the re-issuance of the resident registration certificate in the name of E, which is a private document concerning rights and duties, and exercised it.

B. On May 23, 2013, the Defendant, at the SK Telecom K agency located in the Seogu Daegu-gu, submitted two copies of the new service contract to the customer information column “E: E, and H, resident registration number: H: F, and resident registration number: F, fee payment method: agricultural cooperative, A, L, and customer column, signed on the name, and submitted it to the said agency’s non-employee who is aware of the forgery.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged two copies of a new service contract in the name of E, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised them.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place, as described in Paragraph 1-b, presented two forged new service contracts and two new E’s resident registration certificates that were newly issued as above, by deceiving employees from the Agency’s non-agency staff as if they were E, and deceiving them by receiving two cell phoness in the amount of KRW 89,800 from the above employees, and acquired the total amount of KRW 1,79,600 from the said employees.

[2014 High Court Decision 2047] Defendant around August 7, 2013:30.