대여금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from December 1, 2009 to June 17, 2014.
1. In full view of the evidence No. 1-1, No. 2, No. 2, and No. 3 as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff’s entire purport of the pleading is as follows: (a) around February 9, 2009; and (b) the same year to the Defendant.
2. Around 16.16. Around 25.0 million won, including KRW 40,000,000,000, and the defendant on April 5, 2009, borrowed money to the plaintiff on the same year.
9. The defendant prepared a cash receipt stating that he will repay up to 30.30, and even thereafter, the defendant prepared a cash receipt stating that he will repay 30 million won to the plaintiff by November 30, 2009. However, it can be acknowledged that the defendant has not paid the above loan up to the present day.
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 30 million won of the above loan and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act from December 1, 2009 to June 17, 2014, the delivery date of the copy of the complaint in this case, and 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment.
Although the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff did not have paid money to the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s assertion is inconsistent with the Defendant’s statement that he received KRW 40 million from the Plaintiff’s investigative agency as a restaurant acquisition fund, and thus, it is difficult to accept.
2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.