난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled or added below, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The 4th 10th 10 written judgment of the first instance court was written with "It is difficult to recognize that the threat as alleged by the Plaintiff exists, even if considering the contents described in the 1 and 2nd 5 and 6th 10th 6th .".
At the fourth and fourth bottom of the judgment of the first instance, the plaintiff alleged to the effect that "the plaintiff occupied 14th level 9.0 points in 2018, which is considerably higher than that of North Korea (93.2, 28th level) (the evidence No. 8-2, 1, 2, and 3th level), and that there is no expectation for any protection from the police of its country (the evidence No. 9-1, 2), and that there is a lot of problems in Austria's judicial system (the evidence No. 9-2), in light of the fact that some of the data prepared by the Ministry of Justice are contained in ASEAN's legal situation (the evidence No. 10th). However, it is difficult to deem that the plaintiff could not expect the protection of Hungary's judicial authorities against the plaintiff merely because the above circumstance alleged by the plaintiff is insufficient."
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.