A. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court (a fine of three million won) is too unhued and unreasonable.

B. The sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the nature of the instant crime and the nature of the instant crime, and the progress after the instant crime, etc., considering the fact that the commission of the instant crime is bad, and the amount of damage caused by the instant crime is not indicated as KRW 10 million, and even if the Defendant consistent with the reasoning that it is difficult to understand in the lower court’s court and civil procedure, the need to punish the Defendant solemnly is recognized.

However, in light of the above defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate, and each of the above arguments by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit, since it is acknowledged that the sentence of the court below is appropriate in light of various conditions of sentencing that are shown in pleadings, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that all of the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant are without merit. It is