If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 09:00 on February 25, 2016, the Defendant expressed that “the Defendant, who was unloading the steel at the time when he was asked to the head of the relevant site office for the noise problem at the construction site by the victim D (n, 49 years of age) in front of the Daegu Suwon-gu Construction Site (hereinafter referred to as “the Defendant”), was a cargo driver, and that “the Defendant was flick and flicked at the time when he was flick and flicked,” and the Defendant expressed the victim’s objection.

For this reason, the Defendant used a dangerous object vehicle in front of and rear two times, as the victims of the vehicle walked in the E-5 tons cargo truck, which was loaded for delivery of steel bars, and used a dangerous object vehicle in front of and rear, and used the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. The application of statutes on the actual survey report, field photographs, and field map;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;