In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

1. On October 5, 2015, the Defendants’ co-principaled Defendants were unable to resist the entrance of the above restaurant between about 15 minutes, on the grounds that “F, an employee of the said restaurant, completed the business hours,” and “F, as an employee of the said restaurant, was “I would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would know you would.”

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

2. Defendant A, on the ground that the term “a police officer,” a police officer belonging to the Daegu Police Station G Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), is bad, Defendant A’s part of the slopeH’s boomed by hand to a slope H, and was placed in a police uniform.

As a result, it interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties by police officers on public safety and maintenance of order.

3. Defendant B stated in the indictment of this case in the indictment of this case to Defendant B, a police officer affiliated with the Mana Police Station G police station, on the same date and time as, and at a place, Defendant B’s act as, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the same Article, as “victim Ha,” but it is apparent that it is a clerical error of “victim Ha,” and thus ex officio correct it.

In this case, A was arrested as a flagrant offender, referring to the larger sound called "Yeman Do, this son," and the victim's arms by cutting off the victim's arms by hand and pushed down the victim's arms over the floor.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties by police officers on public safety and maintenance of order, and at the same time, the victim failed to suspend the loss that requires medical treatment for the number of days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of I, H and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to police officers of I knife and knife photographs;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the Criminal Act.