When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[Judgment falling under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code] On January 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on January 9, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 30, 2012.

[Criminal facts] No person shall provide a game product that has not been rated for distribution or use, display or store it for such purpose, and he/she shall not exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase the tangible and intangible outcome obtained through the use of the game product as a business.

1. On January 18, 201, the Defendant in violation of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry, along with B and C, conspired with the Defendant in mind to operate a game room on the first floor D underground in a light name, the Defendant and (not having known the sex) B, and C shared the shares in the game room. The actual proprietor who entered into a lease contract with the building owner of the game room, and E entered into a lease contract with the said game room, and the employee of the said game hall, F, G, who is an employee of the said game room, and the game room, and managing the said game room, while, if the above game hall is controlled, the president of the term “the person who was the head of the game site,” who was scheduled to make a statement as if the game hall was actually a business owner, and F, who was an employee in charge of exchanging in the above game room, in order to share

Accordingly, the Defendant, along with (not knowing the sex) B, C, E, and F from January 3, 201 to January 18, 201, set up 45 game paths in the sea which did not receive the rating in the above game field from January 18, 2011, and offered them for the use of the above game products by many and unspecified customers, and exchanged the points that the said customers acquired through the use of the above game products in cash in the number indicated on the screen.

Accordingly, the defendant's act of exchanging the result obtained through the use of game water in collusion with (not known to the sex) B, C, E, and F, by providing customers with game water not classified as rating.