beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.05.31 2018고단2148

퇴거불응등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 2148"

1. On December 15, 2018, the Defendant was demanded to close the door door from the victim C’s main points located in Pyeongtaek-si B around 01:20 on December 15, 2018.

The defendant does not comply with such request, and on the same day at around 01:40 on the same day, and without good cause, leaves the victim until a police officer dispatched by a report by the victim arrives.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

2. The defendant, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1) above, shall leave from the police officer belonging to the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station E Zone E zone, called out after receiving a report that the defendant does not leave from his house, as stated in the above paragraph (1) above.

For the reason that the Gu received frying, the chest of the F was tightly sealed once, and the F's working uniform was fryed.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives, bodies, and property of the police officers.

"2019 Highest 382"

3. The criminal defendant is a person who works in two G chemical seals.

Around July 4, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim I to the effect that “The extent of two children can be employed when our people become the chairperson of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Commission. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 55 million, then (victim) children will be employed in G. If the Defendant did not find employment until the end of December 2017, the Defendant would immediately return the money borrowed.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to find employment in G, and he did not have any intention or ability to pay the money because he thought that the money was used for debt repayment, card payment, etc.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, from the victim to the J bank account (K) in the name of the Defendant, KRW 30 million on July 15, 2016, and around 25,000 on July 25, 201.