When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 2, 2014, at around 02:55, the Defendant is driving Cysta car within the Gwangju Western Police Station Traffic Investigation Office, located in the Seo-gu Standing Park.

Although Co-Defendant D had never escaped by causing a traffic accident, and Co-Defendant D had escaped by causing the above traffic accident, the defendant is driving the above rocketing car on the front of the internal apartment house around 00:08 on the same day to the assistant E and the Inspector F in charge of the traffic accident investigation according to the above D's teachers.

The statement was made to the effect that the traffic accident did not take necessary measures even though it did not cause a traffic accident.

As a result, the defendant got the defendant to escape the above D who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning suspect interrogation protocol concerning D;

1. Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be subject to criticism.

However, although the defendant was unable to refuse D's personal request, he/she was led to the crime of this case immediately after the crime of this case was led to the confession during the investigation process, and the defendant violated his/her depth through confinement life for a considerable period of time, etc., the punishment against the defendant shall be determined as ordered.