2. The lower court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment, taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant and favorable to the Defendant.

In full view of the facts that are the conditions for sentencing in this court, in particular, the damaged goods are returned and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, but the defendant has already been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the criminal act of this case was committed during the repeated period of habitual special larceny, there is no circumstance that the judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion, or that maintaining the judgment of the court below is unreasonable.

In addition, even if the circumstances and results of the instant crime were to be considered after the commission of the crime, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the Defendant, the sentence of the lower court is not deemed to be inappropriate because it is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.