However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

1. Defendant B is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on December 16, 1990. A.

At around 18:00 on January 31, 2012, the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with A in a room where it is impossible to identify the heading room of “G” located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F.

B. Around 21:00 on February 15, 2012, the Defendant sent to a room where the head of the above hotel could not be known. A and a single sexual intercourse were sent to the room.

In this respect, the defendant was sent to the above A twice.

2. Defendant A knew that he was a spouse of the above B, and even at the same time and place as above, Defendant A had sexual intercourses with the above B twice, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Photographs of a place of publication;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on marriage relation certificates

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account that the Defendants reflect the instant crime);