2. The court's reasoning for this part of the parties' assertion is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of

3. Determination

A. In full view of the Plaintiff’s respective entries and arguments as to Gap’s 3 to 6, 11, and Eul’s 7: (a) KRW 234,00,000 for the purchase of the Plaintiff’s equity shares and the instant shares (i.e., KRW 117,00,000 for Defendant D’s equity shares KRW 70,000; KRW 47,000 for Defendant E-70,000 for the acquisition of the Plaintiff’s equity shares); (b) the Plaintiff transferred KRW 200,00,000 to Defendant C’s account with 30,000,000,000 shares on July 21, 2008; and (c) the Plaintiff paid KRW 30,00,000 for the Plaintiff’s 20,000,000 shares in the Plaintiff’s shares in the Plaintiff’s 30,000 shares in the Plaintiff’s shares on July 23, 2008.